“I didn’t fail. I just found ten thousand ways that didn’t work.” – Thomas Edison
The scientific process is a funny thing. Sometimes the biggest discoveries come from being wrong. Or unintentionally.
For example, Susan Freinkel, author of “Plastic: A Toxic Love Story,” explained how scientists first discovered that plastic was not inert…
But we’ve known since the early ’70s that DEHP leaches out of vinyl, and the way that we know is that there were a pair of scientists at that time who were doing some experiments with rat livers. It doesn’t really matter what they were trying to do.
But they kept finding this weird, strange compound that was fouling up their experiments, and when they set out to figure out what it was, they discovered it was DEHP. And they were very surprised because everybody had assumed that this is, you know, an inert material.
So how do you make sure that you gain value from each test you run, even when the changes you work hard on making lose to your original? How do you ensure that a loss is, as I like to call it, a “negative lift.”
Join us for our next Web clinic (educational funding provided by HubSpot) this Wednesday at 4 p.m. EDT when our Managing Director, Flint McGlaughlin, will share a loss from a test we ran…and how we ultimately used the learnings from that test to drive an increase in conversion – Negative Lifts: How we turned a 25% loss into a 141% increase in conversion.
But before we share our process, we wanted to hear how your marketing peers handle a loss. What happens when you run a test and don’t get a lift? How do you use a loss to improve your marketing? Here are a few of our favorite responses…
Read more…