<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Marketing Intuition (Contest): Can you spot the best landing page?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.marketingexperiments.com/blog/clinic-notes/marketing-intuition-landing-pages.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.marketingexperiments.com/blog/clinic-notes/marketing-intuition-landing-pages.html</link>
	<description>Marketing insights, answers, and research from the analysts at MarketingExperiments.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 19:19:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marketing Intuition (Contest): Which email is more engaging?</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingexperiments.com/blog/clinic-notes/marketing-intuition-landing-pages.html/comment-page-1#comment-23363</link>
		<dc:creator>Marketing Intuition (Contest): Which email is more engaging?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2011 13:39:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingexperiments.com/blog/?p=3997#comment-23363</guid>
		<description>[...] So here we are again with a new experiment and a new opportunity for you to finally be recognized as the brilliant marketer that you are…. or weren’t last time. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] So here we are again with a new experiment and a new opportunity for you to finally be recognized as the brilliant marketer that you are…. or weren’t last time. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingexperiments.com/blog/clinic-notes/marketing-intuition-landing-pages.html/comment-page-1#comment-6861</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2010 02:32:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingexperiments.com/blog/?p=3997#comment-6861</guid>
		<description>I will say treatment #3. @mrjwhit</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I will say treatment #3. @mrjwhit</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingexperiments.com/blog/clinic-notes/marketing-intuition-landing-pages.html/comment-page-1#comment-6859</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2010 01:18:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingexperiments.com/blog/?p=3997#comment-6859</guid>
		<description>Without seeing what&#039;s in the top green banner it&#039;s hard to say with any real accuracy.

There could be an offer in there that is more compelling or distracting.

It also looks like that banner changes in every treatment, so without any knowledge of what that element is, it introduces a major unknown into this process.

IF pressed I would say Treatment 3, but even that suffers from a Call To Action that is in the wrong place below the fold.

Of course there could be a CTA in the blurry green banner at the top. There&#039;s what looks like a blurry purple button similar to the other CTA&#039;s in there.

But as I&#039;ve already said, without being able to actually see what&#039;s in there, it&#039;s hard to say.

If there is no CTA above the fold, then I would certainly add one to this treatment.

Also, I wouldn&#039;t have thought traders in Foreign Exchange would be too worried about a $2.95 trade commission.

There are probably other things that are more important to them.

But you&#039;d have to survey the companies users to find out what the key motivators actually are. As I said, I doubt if $2.95 is the top priority.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Without seeing what&#8217;s in the top green banner it&#8217;s hard to say with any real accuracy.</p>
<p>There could be an offer in there that is more compelling or distracting.</p>
<p>It also looks like that banner changes in every treatment, so without any knowledge of what that element is, it introduces a major unknown into this process.</p>
<p>IF pressed I would say Treatment 3, but even that suffers from a Call To Action that is in the wrong place below the fold.</p>
<p>Of course there could be a CTA in the blurry green banner at the top. There&#8217;s what looks like a blurry purple button similar to the other CTA&#8217;s in there.</p>
<p>But as I&#8217;ve already said, without being able to actually see what&#8217;s in there, it&#8217;s hard to say.</p>
<p>If there is no CTA above the fold, then I would certainly add one to this treatment.</p>
<p>Also, I wouldn&#8217;t have thought traders in Foreign Exchange would be too worried about a $2.95 trade commission.</p>
<p>There are probably other things that are more important to them.</p>
<p>But you&#8217;d have to survey the companies users to find out what the key motivators actually are. As I said, I doubt if $2.95 is the top priority.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Linda</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingexperiments.com/blog/clinic-notes/marketing-intuition-landing-pages.html/comment-page-1#comment-6845</link>
		<dc:creator>Linda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2010 23:32:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingexperiments.com/blog/?p=3997#comment-6845</guid>
		<description>I would go with Treatment#3. With the elements in the left-hand column changed into a simple navigation,it doesn&#039;t distract from the main body of the copy. The awards and testimonials on the right build trust. Good concise details in the copy to help make a good decision. Clear and big CTA button.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would go with Treatment#3. With the elements in the left-hand column changed into a simple navigation,it doesn&#8217;t distract from the main body of the copy. The awards and testimonials on the right build trust. Good concise details in the copy to help make a good decision. Clear and big CTA button.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rori Stumpf</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingexperiments.com/blog/clinic-notes/marketing-intuition-landing-pages.html/comment-page-1#comment-6838</link>
		<dc:creator>Rori Stumpf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2010 22:43:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingexperiments.com/blog/?p=3997#comment-6838</guid>
		<description>#3, @flythesky</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#3, @flythesky</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Peterson</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingexperiments.com/blog/clinic-notes/marketing-intuition-landing-pages.html/comment-page-1#comment-6828</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Peterson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2010 21:16:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingexperiments.com/blog/?p=3997#comment-6828</guid>
		<description>Treatment #1;  @flyingbean

This particular audience wants things to-the-point.  The second big button, nice and high, directly in the eye path, is the clincher.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Treatment #1;  @flyingbean</p>
<p>This particular audience wants things to-the-point.  The second big button, nice and high, directly in the eye path, is the clincher.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

