<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Holistic Marketing Optimization: What’s more likely to show up on Twitter?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.marketingexperiments.com/blog/practical-application/customer-in-charge.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.marketingexperiments.com/blog/practical-application/customer-in-charge.html</link>
	<description>Marketing insights, answers, and research from the analysts at MarketingExperiments.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 19:19:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: MarketingExperiments Blog: Research-driven optimization, testing, and marketing ideas &#187; Transparent Marketing and Social Media: Twitter and Facebook are the new Woodward and Bernstein</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingexperiments.com/blog/practical-application/customer-in-charge.html/comment-page-1#comment-26096</link>
		<dc:creator>MarketingExperiments Blog: Research-driven optimization, testing, and marketing ideas &#187; Transparent Marketing and Social Media: Twitter and Facebook are the new Woodward and Bernstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2011 18:24:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingexperiments.com/blog/?p=4221#comment-26096</guid>
		<description>[...] Holistic Marketing Optimization: What’s more likely to show up on Twitter? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Holistic Marketing Optimization: What’s more likely to show up on Twitter? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anti-crowdsourcing: On (not) getting marketing ideas from your customers</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingexperiments.com/blog/practical-application/customer-in-charge.html/comment-page-1#comment-14727</link>
		<dc:creator>Anti-crowdsourcing: On (not) getting marketing ideas from your customers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 07:02:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingexperiments.com/blog/?p=4221#comment-14727</guid>
		<description>[...] written some posts recently about how the customer should be in charge of your marketing (and really perhaps everything you do as a company). And hopefully along the way we’ve provided [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] written some posts recently about how the customer should be in charge of your marketing (and really perhaps everything you do as a company). And hopefully along the way we’ve provided [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Social Media and the CEO: Does Twitter know more than Henry Ford?</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingexperiments.com/blog/practical-application/customer-in-charge.html/comment-page-1#comment-9746</link>
		<dc:creator>Social Media and the CEO: Does Twitter know more than Henry Ford?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 14:27:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingexperiments.com/blog/?p=4221#comment-9746</guid>
		<description>[...] a recent blog post, Andy Mott brought up some excellent points about siloes and skewed compensations plans in [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a recent blog post, Andy Mott brought up some excellent points about siloes and skewed compensations plans in [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marketing Leader’s Perspective: No cogs allowed in social media and content marketing</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingexperiments.com/blog/practical-application/customer-in-charge.html/comment-page-1#comment-9696</link>
		<dc:creator>Marketing Leader’s Perspective: No cogs allowed in social media and content marketing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 07:03:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingexperiments.com/blog/?p=4221#comment-9696</guid>
		<description>[...] To find out, I talked to Brian Carroll, the CEO of InTouch (our sister company). While you might know Brian as the guy when it comes to lead generation and lead nurturing for complex sales, he made a very interesting comment on a recent blog post I wrote with Andy Mott about marketing silos. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] To find out, I talked to Brian Carroll, the CEO of InTouch (our sister company). While you might know Brian as the guy when it comes to lead generation and lead nurturing for complex sales, he made a very interesting comment on a recent blog post I wrote with Andy Mott about marketing silos. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Carroll</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingexperiments.com/blog/practical-application/customer-in-charge.html/comment-page-1#comment-8913</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Carroll</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2010 15:43:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingexperiments.com/blog/?p=4221#comment-8913</guid>
		<description>Great thoughts. This post reminded me of where I think marketers have an opportunity and that starts with our heart. 

What drives us? What role does the heart play in our job as marketers? How do we create relevance and results for ourselves, our colleagues, and those future customers we hope to reach and influence? 

Can you market something without passion and still be successful? If so, why would you want to? 

I&#039;ve wondered how we can be passionate advocates to others outside our companies if we don&#039;t have close relationships and trust inside our companies? 

To me, disharmony is the enemy of execution. I liked something Seth Godin wrote a while back, &quot;...just about every successful venture is based on an unoriginal idea, beautifully executed.&quot; I agree. We must do ordinary things consistently and be open to the extraordinary ideas that could lead to a breakthrough. 

It starts with our individual heart and our passion (Do I believe in what I&#039;m doing?). Then we orient ourselves to our companies collective heart and passion (Do I believe in my company and what my company does?). Finally, we carry heart and passion outside our companies (Do we believe in what we&#039;re doing?). I think it all It starts with a passion inside that comes from a belief in something greater.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great thoughts. This post reminded me of where I think marketers have an opportunity and that starts with our heart. </p>
<p>What drives us? What role does the heart play in our job as marketers? How do we create relevance and results for ourselves, our colleagues, and those future customers we hope to reach and influence? </p>
<p>Can you market something without passion and still be successful? If so, why would you want to? </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve wondered how we can be passionate advocates to others outside our companies if we don&#8217;t have close relationships and trust inside our companies? </p>
<p>To me, disharmony is the enemy of execution. I liked something Seth Godin wrote a while back, &#8220;&#8230;just about every successful venture is based on an unoriginal idea, beautifully executed.&#8221; I agree. We must do ordinary things consistently and be open to the extraordinary ideas that could lead to a breakthrough. </p>
<p>It starts with our individual heart and our passion (Do I believe in what I&#8217;m doing?). Then we orient ourselves to our companies collective heart and passion (Do I believe in my company and what my company does?). Finally, we carry heart and passion outside our companies (Do we believe in what we&#8217;re doing?). I think it all It starts with a passion inside that comes from a belief in something greater.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

