Site Optimization
Marketer's Intuition Tested | Marketer's Intuition Tested |
| Monday, 30 January 2006 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Topic: Marketer's Intuition — While intuition may reward us with breakthrough ideas, it often fails us when it comes to identifying the most effective text and design for our ads, emails, and web pages. We recently released the audio recording of our clinic on this topic. You can listen to a recording of this clinic here: There is no doubt that intuition and moments of great insight can have a profound impact on your marketing efforts. We all know of business leaders who have achieved extraordinary success for their companies by following their instincts and capitalizing on moments of great insight. However, when we get down to the details of how best to communicate our value proposition in words and design, intuition appears to be a great deal less reliable.
In this brief we will walk you through some of our own test results, and also share the results of your own intuition when it comes to identifying the best-performing copy and design.
Test 1: Multivariate TestingIn our recent clinic on multivariate testing, we looked at JoAnn.com, a website serving millions of arts and crafts enthusiasts. The company used Offermatica to set up multivariate tests in a number of site areas. After one round of testing, they registered the following improvements:
But the most memorable lesson was this: the offer that the marketing team thought would be the least viable ("buy two sewing machines and save 10 percent") actually generated the highest return. "People were pulling their friends together and we sold enough ... machines to outperform single purchases," said Linsly Donnelly, JoAnn.com's chief operating officer. Many of us, as marketers, would have thought, "Who needs two sewing machines?" But the close-knit nature of the crafts community proved to create significant increased returns through word of mouth. KEY POINT: Even the smartest marketers are often proven wrong by testing. Intuition is no substitute for well-designed experiments. Test 2: Offer PageIn an optimization effort for one of our test sites, we believed that customers visiting the site with an 800x600 or 1024x768 resolution monitor were not finding the relevant sales language for the primary site product unless they scrolled down that page. We set up an A/B/C split to test this hypothesis:
Here were the actual pages tested: Before revealing our test results, we polled the audience of one of our web conferences. We asked them to vote for which page they thought would perform the best. Here is a breakdown of their votes:
In addition, many of the members of our team believed that Page C would perform the best. Our experts and many of the seasoned marketers on the phone all seemed to believe that Page C would out-pull the other two pages. But here are the results of our testing:
KEY POINT:What seems "intuitive" to most marketers is not always revealed as the best page after testing. In this test, our hypothesis about important sales language appearing higher on the page proved correct. However, the two-column approach of Page C was ineffective. Test 3: PPC Headline CopyIn our next test, we tested four PPC headlines on Google AdWords. We polled an audience of 50,000+ marketing professionals, asking them to select which headline they thought would generate the highest click-through rate (CTR). These ads were tested on the following selection of keywords:
Here are the results of the survey:
Here are the actual test results:
In this case, our marketing audience was able to predict the headline with the greatest success. KEY POINT: Intuition proved sufficient to select the most DESCRIPTIVE headline, which performed the best out of our selected group. Test 4: Email Subject Line Copy
Interestingly, our survey respondents favored the worst performing subject line. Why did almost 50% of respondents choose the worst line? Probably because it appears to be the "strongest" line, pushing and challenging the reader. However, the data demonstrates that the less pushy, more passive lines generated higher open rates and click-through rates. This is an excellent example of a result that is counter-intuitive. Hence the need for rigorous testing. The following guidelines will be helpful in determining the best applications of marketing intuition:
Intuition and testing are not mutually exclusive. Far from it. They go together. Being dependent on intuition alone leaves you flying blind, crossing your fingers and hoping for the best. At the same time, testing without being open to intuitive leaps tends to constrict breakthrough thinking. Here is an example. Bridges.com publishes newsletters for career counselors and students. Most of their newsletters are fairly conservative. Then one day a new and very young employee suggested writing a newsletter to the 18-24 age group in the voice of an alien from outer space. They even had a cartoon image of the alien as part of the masthead. This newsletter grew very rapidly and became hugely successful for them. The idea came from an intuitive leap. Testing of the regular newsletter lineup would never have yielded the idea of developing a career counseling newsletter written in the voice of an alien. However, from the first day, they tested elements of the alien newsletter, first against a very small group of subscribers. Both intuition and testing have their place. It's a matter of embracing both and knowing the right time to apply them. As Henri Poincaré stated: "It is through science that we prove, but through intuition that we discover.
RELATED MEC REPORTS:
Credits: Editor — Flint McGlaughlin Writers — Brian Alt Contributors — Jalali Hartman HTML Designer — Cliff Rainer
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
