Site Optimization
Site Design 2 Tested, Section 1 (Research) ![]() |
| Site Design 2 Tested, Section 1 (Research) |
| Saturday, 05 January 2002 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Topic: Site Design - How can we improve the effectiveness of our home page? (Part 2) Test Number: #112501-SD Word Count: 3450+ Focus: 11 Questions
Credits:
TEST SUMMARY We analyzed 2 different web sites to determine how to produce effective results with the design of your home page. TEST PRODUCT SITE A - Marketing Service TEST COSTS Data Analysis (Labor) = $4200
Question: How does a fast-track Internet growth company attract more than 10,0000 daily visitors, acquire more than 2500 B2B customers, and still find itself desperately unprofitable. Answer: They attract the wrong visitors, acquire the wrong customers, and sink into a quagmire of tedious customer support. Their fate is not uncommon, in the littered landscape of Internet "has-beens" and "could-have-beens". And there are lessons to be learned. The effective marketer must ask: Is our home page designed to attract a tumultuous multitude of general visitors, or is it designed to attract a rich selection of the right visitors? For the past 60 days, we have focused our reports on home page design. In the December issue of the Journal we examined PART 1. The questions we addressed included:
You can review this report here. In PART 1, we examined the RESPONSE of visitors to a site's home page. This data can be useful, but in and of itself, it does not go far enough. The careful marketer must also examine the QUALITY of visitors to a site's home page. How can you study your customer service metrics to learn whether or not your homepage is appealing to the right prospects?Is your site appealing to and converting the right customers. If you are not certain, then perhaps you should mine your customer service numbers. They hold a wealth of insight.
***> What you need to UNDERSTAND: When you compare the Average Support Ticket Per Day, Per Customer, SITE A is 3400 times higher than SITE B. It is hard to fathom the difference between these two sites. But consider these points.
SITE A is in trouble. How can a young company continue to grow, when capital is in such short supply, and support is in such high demand? For each of its active customers, SITE A generates 1.7 support tickets per month. We are reminded of the old codger, in a dreadful hurry, who ran down the hill "soooooooooooo fast, he stepped on his beard, an' swallered hisself." In the first Internet Revolution, companies maintained a deadly emphasis on "eyeballs". Life was about page views, unique visitors, and registered users. The omniscient business seers predicted that obscene profits would (eventually) come to those who built a substantial even if free user base. They were wrong. Today they are trumpeting "Revenue! revenue! Eyeballs aren't enough. Charge for access; quit giving the farm away! Get the revenue and the profits will follow". They are wrong again. Business is still about what business is always about... whether you are a brick layer, or a tech wizard. It's about what's left over after you pay the bills. We would be wise to trade the Prophets for the profits. We would be doubly wise to make certain we are appealing to the RIGHT market with the RIGHT message. The message you communicate with your home page should be devoid of hype. It should allow site visitors to self-screen themselves. How can you keep your home page from appealing to the wrong prospects?SITE A has made several critical mistakes, but their (highly effective) management team is actively correcting these. Here are six keys that will help you to focus your site on the right prospects. (*1)
Peter Drucker said that the effective executive does not just focus on doing things right. He focuses on doing the right things. Our beleaguered staff of researchers would add that the effective marketer does not just focus on the right message for the people. He focuses on the right people for the message. Section 2 (Continue...) |
|||||||||||||||||||||


