Email Optimization
Email Optimization ![]() |
| Email Optimization |
| Tuesday, 18 March 2008 | |||||||||||||||||||
Topic: Email Optimization: How Relevance Lifts ConversionAnyone who has set up an email campaign knows many factors need to be considered before hitting the Send button:
Mastering any process requires knowing where to begin, and email optimization is no exception. This brief introduces a symbolic notation illustrating our approach to that process: The MarketingExperiments Email Optimization Sequencesm. We are seeking answers to two key questions:
The following case studies underscore the importance of ensuring relevance between a Landing Page and the channel that brings visitors to it—in this case an email—before moving on to the other elements in our sequence. EMAIL OPTIMIZATION FORMULAS
The MarketingExperiments Email Optimization Sequencesm The MarketingExperiments Email Optimization Sequencesm, by its structure and notation, is designed to convey this essential optimization principle: You should sequence your optimization efforts in the opposite order from the physical conversion-to-sale process. In the physical conversion-to-sale process:
Although the Sequence symbols are listed from left to right in accordance with the physical conversion process, the "operator" symbols point from right to left: When performing the optimization process, start with the end in mind. MarketingExperiments recommends applying an email-specific formula called the Email Messaging Effectiveness Indexsm, shown below, to each stage in the optimization sequence, Key point: The variables in the index apply to every step of the conversion process, but the way in which they are applied is unique at each stage. This concept is illustrated by the arrow from the Landing Page step of the Optimization Sequence formula to the Email Messaging Effectiveness Index: Editor’s note: MarketingExperiments offers professional certification courses in Email Marketing which offer in-depth coverage of the entire process of email messaging optimization. More information is available by . BACKGROUND Let’s now look at the first element in the relationship between the offer Landing Page and your email’s effectiveness: Relevance, or "rv" in the Index above. Merriam-Webster Online defines relevance as: 1 a: relation to the matter at hand b: practical and especially social applicability : pertinence <giving relevance to college courses> Relevance in Landing Page Optimization Creating relevance between the Landing Page and the visitors’ motivations when they first click-through from an email is essential. Every element of your Landing Page should either state or support your primary offer’s Value Proposition. If a Landing Page is incongruent with what visitors expect upon arrival—if it is irrelevant or confusing—conversion rate will suffer. The offer must satisfy the visitor’s expectation within seconds. Relevance in Email Email relevance consists of two factors: a list-specific factor and an offer-specific factor. By "list-specific" we mean the reason you have the email addresses in the first place:
But the list-specific factor alone is not enough. Email relevance must be offer-specific, too. The offer expressed in your email message must be relevant to their current motivation—something they want right now. It must also be uniquely valuable and instantly credible, no matter where you got the address. Offer-specific relevance can be intensified with urgency: The perception of an opportunity or risk related to the passage of time. Urgency can be present prior to arrival or instilled after arrival. Key point: Even if you manage to get click-throughs to a Landing Page, unless the page immediately convinces your visitors that you may have what they are looking for, they will click away.
Case Study 1 Subscription sales of the electronic version of a major newspaper had become stagnant. The strategic goal of the project was to increase revenue by increasing the rate of new subscriptions. The test’s objective was to increase paid subscriptions by using a free-trial offer coupled with specific design changes meant to reduce Friction and alleviate customer Anxiety on the Landing Page. Editor’s note: We’ve obscured the company’s name and logo for anonymity. Results
Observations Though the pop-up to prospective customers in the "Before" version (the Control) announced an attractive free trial …
In the optimized version of the Landing Page, relevance (rv) to the offer is communicated throughout the Landing Page:
Case Study 2 Eloqua is a lead generation software firm. The email campaign’s goal was to increase take-up of Eloqua’s Web-based seminars and increase qualified customer leads. Eloqua’s strategy was to send a Webinar invitation to targeted leads on their house list. When a prospect clicked on the registration link it sent him to a personalized Landing Page with his personal information already filled in on the form’s fields. All he had to do was click the "Submit" button. Eloqua also sent invitations to a rented list where nothing would be filled in: Two weeks before the Webinar, Eloqua sent out a reminder email asking invitees to "respond with their biggest challenges" and "what they hoped to learn from the event." The company sent additional reminders one week before, two days before, and the morning of the event. After the Webinar, it sent a thank you email to the attendees and a follow-up email to no-shows, telling them that the audio from the Webinar was available. The combination of the email series and the personalized landing pages worked very well: Eloqua exceeded its lead generation goal by 64% and exceeded its "sales opportunity" goal by 61%, converting 14.6% into sales for a 2,000% campaign ROI. 66% of those sales originated from the personalized offer to the house list. Summary
Related Marketing Experiments Reports
As part of our research, we have prepared a review of the best Internet resources on this topic. Rating System These sites were rated for usefulness and clarity, but alas, the rating is purely subjective. * = Decent | ** = Good | *** = Excellent | **** = Indispensable
Credits:Editor(s) — Hunter Boyle Writer(s) — Peg Davis Contributor(s) — Jimmy Ellis HTML Designer — Cliff Rainer Email Designer — Holly Hicks Testing Protocols — TP4000-11 |
|||||||||||||||||||







